Key Takeaways

• Despite slowing momentum, the U.S. economy can be seen as a glass that is half full rather than half empty, with strong employment powering personal consumption, the main driver of gross domestic product (GDP).
• The extreme size disparities between the largest companies in the S&P 1500 Index and the rest have produced valuation and concentration risk not seen since the 1990s. Active management offers ways to plot a different course from the benchmark.
• Demonstrating our investment discipline, Davis Opportunity Fund is focused on a relatively small number of positions with an overall earnings growth rate comparable to the S&P 1500 but at a valuation substantially below that of the index.

Market Perspectives:

This year the U.S. economy has expanded at a slow pace with GDP increasing by an annual rate of 1.4% in the first quarter. U.S. stocks meanwhile continued their advance and the S&P 1500 returned 14.35% in the first half of 2024.

Despite the slowdown in economic momentum, we would still characterize today's economy as a glass that is half full rather than half empty. The jobs market is all-important in this regard because it underpins and powers roughly 70% of our GDP in the form of consumption. We have come a long way since the post-crisis high in unemployment which touched 10% in 2010 and is now 4%, a level that is indicative of a relatively tight jobs market. Inflation remains stubborn but has eased considerably in each of the last two years, falling from a high of 9.1% in 2022 to 3% as of June this year.

We believe that the S&P 1500 today at its current level is vulnerable to bad news, whether it comes in the form of disappointing earnings from certain market darlings at some point or from other factors that could subject the index to multiple contraction.

One path forward in our opinion is to use truly active management. With the freedom and flexibility to own companies at more reasonable valuations and to weight them in a different manner than unmanaged indexes, we believe an actively managed portfolio may hold an advantage over the S&P 1500 portfolio as it is currently structured.

The S&P 1500's valuation today is 22.3 times earnings, which may not be excessive per se, but nor is it cheap. Hence despite the fact that the S&P 1500 is often viewed as a broad proxy for U.S. stocks, it is narrower than usual given the size disparities between the largest companies and the rest of the index. The very largest companies now surpass $3 trillion in total market capitalization, and dwarf the average or median market cap of the index as a whole. In short, the size-based rules of the index's constitution have created vast distortions which introduces a degree of valuation and concentration risk that we have not witnessed since the height of the technology and telecom bubble of the late 1990s.

There is no need to own a market index exclusively. Active management, if approached truly independently from index constitution and structure, may offer ways to plot a different course from the benchmark. In our view, investors should exercise thoughtfulness and prudence in terms of what holdings they select and how an overall portfolio is shaped and structured.

This material includes candid statements and observations regarding investment strategies, individual securities, and economic and market conditions; however, there is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts will prove to be correct. This is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any specific security. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. The Attractive Growth and Undervalued reference in this material relates to underlying characteristics of the portfolio holdings. There is no guarantee that the Fund performance will be positive as equity markets are volatile and an investor may lose money.

Portfolio Review:

Davis Opportunity Fund reflects a very deliberate, research-driven and selective investment process that we have practiced since our Firm's founding in 1969.

The following statistics highlight the differences between our actively managed portfolio and the S&P 1500:

Presently, Davis Opportunity Fund is allocated such that its largest sector weightings include healthcare, technology-related businesses, industrials, and financials.

Healthcare: Underpriced Potential

Healthcare is a meaningful allocation in the portfolio. In this sector, we hold: Quest Diagnostics (DGX, Financial), an independent laboratory and diagnostics service provider; managed care insurers Humana (HUM, Financial), Cigna Health (CI, Financial) and UnitedHealth (UNH, Financial); and Viatris (VTRS, Financial), a manufacturer of generic pharmaceuticals. Recently, we also purchased Solventum (SOLV, Financial), a spin-off from 3M (MMM, Financial) that specializes in healthcare supplies primarily.

The opportunity to own such businesses at what we deem attractive prices is based on our expectation that near-term headwinds suppressing growth in their top- and bottom-line results may abate in the foreseeable future. Meanwhile, market pricing seems to suggest a permanence to what have been tepid earnings and compressed margins in recent periods. We are taking the long view and believe the market is underpricing their multiyear potential.

Technology: Growing Ecosystems

Our technology-related investments rather surgically target companies in very large, still fast-growing ecosystems, including e-commerce, cloud computing, social media, online search and the semiconductor complex. To the extent possible, given our valuation parameters and constraints, we have sought to own leaders in their respective fields but at what we believe represent justifiable valuations. In instances where we cannot justify the valuations of certain market darlings, those have been omitted from our portfolio. Amazon.com (AMZN, Financial), a dominant leader in e-commerce both at home and abroad, is the type of business we favor. In our estimation, the company has strong, clear-minded management, rather unique competitive advantages and powerful financial features. It is one of the more expensive holdings in the portfolio but on an adjusted basis still trades at a reasonable multiple of owner earnings, according to our models. Other technology-related investments within technology include Alphabet (GOOG, Financial), Applied Materials (AMAT, Financial) and Intel Corp. (INTC, Financial).

Industrials: Compounding Machines

Within the industrials segment of the portfolio we hold businesses that specialize in industrial automation (Johnson Controls (JCI, Financial)), agricultural machinery and soil testing (AGCO (AGCO, Financial)), and biofuel products, among others. Darling Ingredients (DAR, Financial), which essentially repurposes bio waste into fuel, is representative of the industrial businesses we favor. These are mundane but highly durable businesses, in our estimation, that may be unexciting to describe but are nonetheless very exciting investment ideas for our team given their wide moats and collective earnings power.

Recently, we sold our position in Ferguson plc (FERGY, Financial) to allocate more capital to other investment opportunities we have identified.

Financials: Diversified Earnings Power

Within financials, our largest position is Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B, Financial)—what we refer to as a “non-financial financial.” It is effectively a hybrid between financial services business lines and other, non-financial businesses. The company's economic interests include railroads, utilities, retail, chartered jets and others, in addition to property casualty insurance and reinsurance. All of those business activities reside under the same corporate umbrella and produce combined annual net income of more than $96 billion today on a $1 trillion market cap. It is fairly rare to see a business model that effectively combines under one roof the cash flows produced from so many different industry sources. One could make the argument that this company's earnings may be “internally diversified” to a larger extent than a pure-play, monoline business.

Among more traditional financials, we hold one of the largest lenders in the U.S., Wells Fargo (WFC), which has more than $1 trillion in total assets. We have been extremely discerning and selective within this sector and, as such, avoided the banks that failed in the recent regional bank crisis. Our decision to steer clear of those institutions stemmed from their apparent mismatches in assets and liabilities which we regard as a risk for any lender beyond certain reasonable limits.

Lastly, we hold Capital One Financial (COF), a consumer finance leader with a strong market position in credit cards, in particular.

Overall, the financials we hold today are among our best and highest-conviction ideas in a sector that for a long time has offered appealing business choices trading at very attractive prices in general.

Other investments in the portfolio include businesses engaged primarily in copper production (Teck Resources (TECK)), among other industries.

Outlook:

The stock market is in fact a large market of many individual stocks. Our goal is to build wealth for our investors and ideally to add value above and beyond market indexes over the long term. As such, we are utilizing our in-house research insights and flexibility to construct a portfolio that in our minds has a more favorable profile than the S&P 1500 based on selectivity, valuation discipline and demonstrated earnings growth.

In conclusion, as stewards of our clients' savings our most important job is growing the value of the funds entrusted to us. With more than $2 billion of our own money invested alongside that of our clients, we are on this journey together.² This alignment with our clients is uncommon in our industry; our conviction in our portfolio of carefully selected companies is more than just words.

1 Five-year EPS Growth Rate (5-year EPS) is the average annualized earnings per share growth for a company over the past 5 years. The values shown
are the weighted average of the 5-year EPS of the stocks in the Fund or Index. Approximately 7.73% of the assets of the Fund are not accounted for in the calculation of 5-year EPS as relevant information on certain companies is not available to the Fund's data provider. Forward Price/Earnings (Forward P/E) Ratio is a stock's price at the date indicated divided by the company's forecasted earnings for the following 12 months based on estimates provided by the Fund's data provider. These values for both the Fund and the Index are the weighted average of the stocks in the portfolio or Index.

²As of 6/30/24 Davis Advisors, the Davis family and Foundation, our employees, and Fund directors have more than $2 billion invested alongside clients in similarly managed accounts and strategies.

This material is authorized for use by existing shareholders. A current Davis Opportunity Fund prospectus must accompany or precede this material if it is distributed to prospective shareholders. You should carefully consider the Fund's investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses before investing. Read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.

This material includes candid statements and observations regarding investment strategies, individual securities, and economic and market conditions; however, there is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts will prove to be correct. These comments may also include the expression of opinions that are speculative in nature and should not be relied on as statements of fact.

Davis Advisors is committed to communicating with our investment partners as candidly as possible because we believe our investors benefit from understanding our investment philosophy and approach. Our views and opinions include “forward-looking statements” which may or may not be accurate over the long term. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words like “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” or similar expressions. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which are current as of the date of this material. We disclaim any obligation to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. While we believe we have a reasonable basis for our appraisals and we have confidence in our opinions, actual results may differ materially from those we anticipate.